FTC Targeting Data Brokers; Some Provide Skip Tracing to ARM Firms

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

The Federal Trade Commission Tuesday announced that it has issued orders requiring nine data brokerage companies to provide the agency with information about how they collect and use data about consumers. Some of the companies provide skip tracing or scoring services to collection agencies.

The FTC noted in its press release that data brokers are companies that collect personal information about consumers from a variety of public and non-public sources and resell the information to other companies.  The agency noted that this often benefits consumers (through fraud prevention, for example) and that it helps companies better target its marketing efforts.

But the FTC is concerned about a lack of transparency around the collection and use of consumer data. It notes that the information from the companies may be used to inform regulations. There are no current laws requiring data brokers to maintain the privacy of consumer data unless they use that data for credit, employment, insurance, housing, or other similar purposes.

Although skip tracing, credit decisioning,  portfolio scoring, and other uses for large sets of consumer data used by ARM companies are already covered by those laws, most of the companies targeted in the information request provide some sort of service to the debt collection and buying industry.

The nine data brokers receiving orders from the FTC are:

1) Acxiom,

2) Corelogic,

3) Datalogix,

4) eBureau,

5) ID Analytics,

6) Intelius,

7) Peekyou,

8) Rapleaf, and

9) Recorded Future.

The FTC is seeking details about:

  • the nature and sources of the consumer information the data brokers collect;
  • how they use, maintain, and disseminate the information; and
  • the extent to which the data brokers allow consumers to access and correct their information or to opt out of having their personal information sold.


Continuing the Discussion

We welcome and encourage readers to comment and engage in substantive exchanges over topics on insideARM.com. Users must always follow our Terms of Use. Also know that your comment will be deleted if you: use profanity, engage in any kind of hate speech, post an incoherent or irrelevant thought, make a point of targeting anyone, or do anything else we find unsavory. Your comment will be posted under your current Display Name, shown below. If you'd like to change your Display Name, you must update it on the My Profile page.

  • avatar DONALD DALY says:

    This skip tracing industry should be as regulated as is the debt recovery industry due to the fact they are joined at the hip. Outsourcing the nheavy lifting part of collecting has allowed too many collectors to transfer ownership of comsumer privacy violations to too many underregulated groups. Regulation is vital (recall wall street) and it’s about time that equal responsibilty is being implemented. Tighter, sensible regulations will put all parties involved on the hook for praise or penalty.

  • avatar Ameripay says:

    Another waste of taxpayer dollars. These data brokers didn’t just draw consumer information out of a hat and give it away. They didn’t hold people at gunpoint and make them fill out informational questionnaires.

    NO, these lazy cow consumers give up all their information willingly and voluntarily and then are upset when it’s sold, re-sold and aggregated. This is a free country. You’re free to keep your information to yourself, you’re free to give it out and the people you give it to are free to use it or sell it as they see fit.

Leave a Reply