Editor's Note: This article was originally published on the Maurice Wutscher blog and is republished here with permission.
--
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed entry of summary judgment against a consumer debtor who claimed that a collection letter’s language, implying that interest or other charges (which the debt collector did not collect on debts referred to it by the creditor and were not referenced in the subject credit agreement) could accrue in the event of a default, violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
View this content by subscribing
Please register to unlock this content
I already have an account. Log in
