Editor's note: This article is provided through a partnership between insideARM and Squire Patton Boggs LLP, which provides a steady stream of timely, insightful and entertaining takes on TCPAWorld.com of the ever-evolving, never-a-dull-moment Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Squire Patton Boggs LLP—and all insideARM articles—are protected by copyright. All rights are reserved.
Although there have been a couple of notable exceptions, most multi-million dollar TCPA settlements go sailing through approval. When they do get hung up, it is usually because the dollars aren’t quite multi-million enough.
But in a new decision out of Washington a district court has rejected a class settlement because the class definition was not based on clearly-defined objective criteria—specifically, it included reference to the TCPA’s amorphous “automated telephone dialing system” definition.
View this content by subscribing
Please register to unlock this content
I already have an account. Log in
