ARM in Focus: the Utilities Industry

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

The utilities industry is not nearly as “sexy” as the healthcare or student loans segments, which always seem to be in the news. Despite the lack of publicity, the utilities industry deserves some attention because it presents opportunities for first- and third-party collection work as well as payment processing.

Revenue Breakdown In 2015, the utilities industry is expected to generate approximately $526 billion in revenue and nearly $620 billion by 2020; that’s an almost $100 billion increase or an annual growth rate of 3.32 percent for the next five years. Electric power transmission, coal and natural gas, and nuclear power segments are driving this growth and they account for approximately 98 percent of all revenue in 2015.

History and Projected Future Revenue

Although investments in green energy companies have increased over the last decade, there is still a long way to go before wind power is producing revenue at levels that appeal to the ARM industry.

Breaking this market down further, Kaulkin Ginsberg projects bad debt will reach $2.12 billion in 2015 and will grow to more than $2.25 billion by 2020. During acquisition periods, utilities companies look to clear delinquent accounts off their books, elevating bad debt levels. Given that M&A transactions in this industry are expected to increase for the next three to five years, we anticipate a high level of delinquent account placements during this period. However, when consolidation occurs, more efficiency usually follows. Bad debt levels as a percentage of total revenue should fall over this period, but grow slightly in absolute value.

Bad Debt

ARM companies considering entry into this market need to consider how regulations vary from state to state. On the one hand, this will present challenges to collection and compliance departments; on the other hand, ARM companies can choose which states they want to compete in based on state-specific regulations. That being said, few operations would or should choose to turn away business from states because they have stricter regulations than some of their neighbors.

This is an excerpt from Kaulkin Ginsberg’s upcoming market intelligence series on the utilities industry, available exclusively through KG Prime. For more information, or to inquire about our strategic advisory services, please email hq@kaulkin.com.

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Posted in Accounts Receivable Management, ARM in Focus, Debt Collection, Debt Recovery, Opinion, Utility Collections .

×
Subscribe to our email newsletters

Continuing the Discussion

We welcome and encourage readers to comment and engage in substantive exchanges over topics on insideARM.com. Users must always follow our Terms of Use. Also know that your comment will be deleted if you: use profanity, engage in any kind of hate speech, post an incoherent or irrelevant thought, make a point of targeting anyone, or do anything else we find unsavory. Your comment will be posted under your current Display Name, shown below. If you'd like to change your Display Name, you must update it on the My Profile page.

Leave a Reply