Compliance Weekly header image

» Forward Compliance Weekly to a friend or
subscribe if this was forwarded to you.

Get practical answers and get on with your work

Reg F, Part II, Out Today Around Noon Eastern


Here's what we know as of now (per a phone call with the CFPB):

  • The rule will be released around noon Eastern. (Though when they said that last time, it went out a little earlier.)
  • The rule is 330+ pages long -- and a lot of that is an in-depth discussion of the validation notice.
  • The three components of Part II are:
    • Validation notices
    • Passive collections
    • Time-barred debt (and, just a sneak preview for later in this bulleted list, there are a LOT of changes to time-barred debt. The validation notices are essentially what we saw in the NPRM, but time-barred debt is...I'm getting ahead of myself.)
  • Validation Notices
    • There will be a requirement on validation notices to have a Bureau-provided link to a website for consumers' rights.
    • State disclosures will be allowed on the back.
    • If states require time-barred debt disclosures, those will be allowed on the front.
    • For safe harbor purposes, you have to use the provided form exactly (with the provisions for state disclosures on the back and time-barred debt on the front)
  • Passive Collections
    • Agencies cannot furnish to CRAs until they've spoken, mailed, or somehow otherwise communicated with the consumer. 
    • If the communication is in writing (regardless if it's via postal mail or electronic communication) agencies must allow a reasonable time to pass between the communication and the furnishing.
    • That reasonable time is 14 days. This is for all communications, whether postal or electronic.
    • Yes, this is dumb.
  • Time-barred Debts
    • This is the greatest departure from the NPRM.
    • Prohibitions remain against suing or threatening suit on time-barred debt.
    • This will have a "known or should have known" component to it, w/r/t if the debt is time-barred or not. (This seems to only be applicable to agencies that pursue legal action.)
    • This will be a strict liability portion of Part II.
    • Agencies cannot be sued for lettering/communicating on time-barred debt.
    • There is no requirement, per Reg F (and that distinction is important), to disclose in your letter that the debt is out-of-stat.
    • You do not have to disclose that the debt may be, or is, time-barred.
    • You do not need to let a consumer know that a payment will re-toll the debt.
    • HOWEVER, state requirements on time-barred debt remain in effect and supercede Reg F.
    • (The reason for this unexpected about-face is: banning time-barred debt outright would make those assets valueless and a hardship on agencies/creditors.)

iA Research Assistant Logo

Hi, compliance professional. Welcome to Compliance Weekly (from the iA Research Assistant and insideARM). We send an email every Wednesday with all the big news affecting creditors, collectors and ARM-industry compliance. You'll get just the news and insight you need, in a condensed and concise format - and that's it!

We're eager to know what you think of the newsletter, and what else you'd like to see here. Email your thoughts to Did a friend forward you the briefing? Sign up here.

To continue receiving email newsletters from insideARM, please add to your address book and/or safe list. All content and articles copyright © by insideARM LLC. All rights reserved. You can review insideARM's privacy policy here. Manage your email newsletter preferences or unsubscribe from this newsletter. Want to suggest a story? Email

Want to be promoted in our publications? See our marketing options.

Our mailing address is: