Federal Judge Sanctions Pittsburgh Law Firm for Writing ‘Imaginary’ Letters on Behalf of Clients in Debt Disputes

Editor's Note: This article, authored by Daniel JT McKenna & Jenny N. Perkins of Ballard Spahr, previously appeared on Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Finance Monitor and is re-published here with permission. 
File folders saying "Court Decistions"tashatuvango / AdobeStock

falsified letters on behalf of clients involved in debt collection disputes.

Attorneys Travis Andrew Gordon, and Joshua P. Ward, and their firm, J.P. Ward & Associates, LLC, filed two suits suit on behalf of clients disputing debts. The suits were filed against Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and accused the company of FDCPA violations. U.S. District Judge Cathy Bissoon explained the plaintiffs’ attorneys then “tasked themselves with drafting ‘dispute letter’ scripts on behalf of debtors, their putative clients” and “[m]ost of the script’s contents, including the passages at the beginning and the end, were a stream-of-conscience spilling of non-sequiturs and random musings.”  The letters did not dispute that the money was owed, but rather whether they owed money to the company seeking to collect the debt. “The weirdly worded and oddly specific scripts were handwritten by firm staff, client-by-client, one by one,” she wrote.

The attorneys freely admitted drafting the letters, contending that their clients gave them permission to write the letters. Bissoon commented that “[i]t is hard to say which was more jarring — the conduct itself, or counsel’s breezy admission, bereft of self-awareness or concern.”

View this content by subscribing

Please register to unlock this content

I already have an account. Log in