On Second Thought…CFPB Continues to Back Off; Dismisses Case Against Payday Lenders

Last Thursday the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) dismissed the case it had filed in April 2017 against four payday lenders. No reason was given. The case is CFPB v. Golden Valley Lending, Inc., Silver Cloud Financial, Inc., Mountain Summit Financial, Inc. and Majestic Lake Financial, Inc. (Civil Case No. 2:17-cv-02521-JAR-JPO)

The original complaint was filed April 27, 2017. You can download a copy here.

The case was dismissed without prejudice. You can download the dismissal notice here.

Editor’s note: Dismissal without prejudice means that the plaintiff is free to re-file a case against the defendant based on the same claim.

The CFPB announced at the time they filed the case that it was taking action against the group of lenders “for deceiving consumers by collecting debt they were not legally owed. The Bureau alleged,

“[t]he four lenders could not legally collect on these debts because the loans were void under state laws governing interest rate caps or the licensing of lenders. The CFPB alleges that the lenders made deceptive demands and illegally took money from consumer bank accounts for debts that consumers did not legally owe. The CFPB seeks to stop the unlawful practices, recoup relief for harmed consumers, and impose a penalty.”

Two days prior to this dismissal, the CFPB announced it would be re-considering the Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans (“Payday Rule“), published in the Federal Register on November 17, 2017, scheduled to take effect January 16, 2018.

This is the latest action in a series that appears intent on undoing the work of former CFPB Director Richard Cordray. Other significant actions by Acting Director Mick Mulvaney include: