Collection agency and debt purchaser CAMCO settled charges by the FTC earlier this week in the amount of $300,000. The company issued a response to the charges and the signed consent decree and has admitted no wrongdoing. In speaking with CollecitonIndustry.com yesterday, a representative of CAMCO said that further information concerning the case would be released by the company in the coming weeks.
Below is the statement released by the FTC regarding the matter. Following it is the statement released by CAMCO.
FTC Release:
Debt Buyer/Debt Collection Companies and Their Principals Settle FTC Charges
Companies that the Federal Trade Commission alleges have threatened and harassed thousands of consumers to get them to pay old, unenforceable debts or debts they did not owe have agreed to settle charges that their abusive and deceptive collection practices violated federal law. The settlement prohibits the companies? alleged abusive debt collection practices in the future, require disclosures to consumers of their rights in the companies? collection notices and communications with consumers, and requires the companies and their principals to pay a $300,000 civil penalty.
The FTC charged that Capital Acquisitions and Management Corp. (CAMCO), its subsidiary, RM Financial Services, Inc., and four principals, engaged in systematic and widespread violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The FTC charges that the principals of the companies were directly involved in the alleged law violations.
CAMCO is a ?debt buyer? ? a company that buys old debts well past the statute of limitations and attempts to collect them. Most of the debts are unenforceable in court and are also so old that they are beyond the reporting periods allowed under the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Some of the debts CAMCO allegedly attempted to collect were already discharged in bankruptcy or had been paid. The FTC charged that in their attempt to collect these debts, the companies engaged in abusive and deceptive collection practices, including:
- Harassing consumers at their workplaces;
- Discussing consumers? debts with third parties;
- Continuing to communicate with consumers after consumers had notified them that they did not owe the money and did not wish to be contacted again;
- Using obscene or profane language;
- Calling consumers continuously with the intention of annoying and abusing them;
- Falsely representing the amount and legal status of the debts;
- Misrepresenting themselves as attorneys;
- Threatening imprisonment, seizure, garnishment, attachment or sale of property or wages with full knowledge that such action could not legally be taken;
- Threatening to take action that could not be legally taken, including threatening to disclose the debts to consumers? employers and threatening to report the debt to consumer reporting agencies even though the debts are past the credit reporting periods; and
- Ignoring consumers disputes of the charges and continuing to harass them after consumers requested verification of the debts.
The settlement with CAMCO, RM Financial, Reese Waugh, Jerome Kuebler, Scott R. Franson, and Mario Bianchi prohibits these deceptive and illegal practices. It further requires the defendants to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $300,000. It requires that all written collection materials sent to consumers contain disclosures about consumers? rights under the FDCPA, provide an address and phone number consumers can use to contact the companies, disclose that the FTC enforces the FDCPA, and disclose ways to contact the FTC. It also contains certain recordkeeping and bookkeeping requirements to allow the FTC to monitor compliance.
?The Commission is accepting this settlement,? said Chairman Timothy J. Muris, ?because there is ample evidence of the defendants? liability. We are reviewing our civil penalty program to determine whether the overall range is appropriate. As part of this review, we will give additional scrutiny to the level of civil penalties in the future.?
The Commission vote to refer the complaint and consent decree to the Department of Justice for filing was 5-0.
The complaint and consent decree were filed on March 24 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, in Rockford, by the United States Attorney and the Department of Justice at the request of the FTC. The consent decree was entered by Judge Phillip G. Reinhard.
NOTE: This consent decree is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by the defendant of a law violation. A consent decree has the force of law when signed by the judge.
CAMCO Release:
STATEMENT BY CAMCO RE: CONSENT DECREE WITH FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
The consent decree entered today by the court reaffirms the commitment of Capital Acquisitions and Management Corporation (CAMCO) to intensive compliance with the many and complex state and federal regulations governing our rapidly growing consumer debt collection industry.
This consent decree was entered with no findings on any issues of fact or law, and acknowledges that CAMCO has not admitted liability for any matters alleged by the FTC complaint.
Any large operation having contacts with many consumers can always do things better when interacting with the public, especially in a business like ours. CAMCO is committed to ensuring responsibility and integrity in our business operations. We will continue to do more to ensure strict compliance.
CAMCO began in 1997 with two employees and has grown to more than employees 340 at our headquarters in Rockford, Illinois. Currently, we are one of a handful of companies in the U.S. currently working to recover unpaid consumer debts that have been outstanding over long periods of time.
Prior to the FTC?s investigation which began in 2002 and concluded last year, we implemented a broad range of controls designed to ensure the highest quality operations, and to comply with these complex regulations. Those controls included retaining the former Illinois deputy attorney general, Michael J. Hayes, Sr., now of Bell, Boyd and Lloyd, LLC, to evaluate our operations and ensure our compliance. Additionally, we require intensive training of all our managers and telephone-based debt collection professionals. We monitor telephone interactions with consumers to ensure the highest standards of business practice.
We will work with the FTC on additional issues raised by the Commission.
