Officers of Debt Collection Agency to Pay $1.1 million; Banned from ARM Industry

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

In the last action of a long-running investigation into a network of debt collection agencies, the Federal Trade Commission said Thursday that the companies’ owner and officers will pay $1.1 million to resolve the matter and be permanently barred from the debt collection industry in the U.S.

The FTC said that the settlement resolves FTC allegations that three debt collection companies, their owner, David M. Hynes II, and the companies’ principals subjected consumers to abusive debt collection practices and deceived their small business clients.  Under the settlement, defendants will pay $700,000.

In a separate settlement, the FTC also obtained over $400,000 in judgments against three other companies that Hynes controlled, which were alleged to have received funds from the defendants’ activities.

The defendants were based in Van Nuys, Calif., but collected debts nationwide. Most of their business was operated under the name Rumson, Bolling & Associates. The FTC’s complaint alleged that the defendants used multiple illegal debt collection practices, most violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and numerous other statutes.

Among other things, the FTC alleged that the defendants berated consumers with obscene and profane language, threatened them with physical harm, improperly disclosed consumers’ debts to their employers, co-workers, neighbors, and other third parties, and falsely threatened consumers with lawsuits, arrest, seizure of their property, or wage garnishment.  Several consumers reported that defendants even threatened to dig up the bodies of consumers’ deceased relatives for alleged non-payment of funeral bills.

The FTC also alleged that the defendants deceived their small business clients.  Using the slogan “no recovery, no fee,” the defendants promised that they would collect their clients’ past-due accounts on a contingency basis.  The FTC alleged that, in many cases, the defendants collected money for a client, then kept all of the money or more than they were entitled to keep.  In some cases, the defendants asked clients for additional fees, purportedly for legal expenses in filing a lawsuit that would “guarantee” the successful collection of a debt.  However, in many cases, the defendants failed to file the promised lawsuits and the clients never received any money in satisfaction of the debt.

This is not the first action the FTC has taken against the Rumson family of companies.

In March 2012, the FTC settled with two other Rumson officers, levying fines and permanently banning them from the debt collection business. The FTC had previously shut down the company in October 2011 and launched the investigation into the officers that culminated Thursday.

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Posted in Collection Laws and Regulations, FDCPA, Featured Post .

×
Subscribe to our email newsletters

Continuing the Discussion

We welcome and encourage readers to comment and engage in substantive exchanges over topics on insideARM.com. Users must always follow our Terms of Use. Also know that your comment will be deleted if you: use profanity, engage in any kind of hate speech, post an incoherent or irrelevant thought, make a point of targeting anyone, or do anything else we find unsavory. Your comment will be posted under your current Display Name, shown below. If you'd like to change your Display Name, you must update it on the My Profile page.

  • avatar todd bean says:

    “Several consumers reported that defendants even threatened to dig up the bodies of consumers’ deceased relatives for alleged non-payment of funeral bills.”

    LOL, any consumer that actually would send their money to somebody that makes this threat deserves to lose their money.

  • avatar Commercial Guy says:

    Surprisingly, Todd, I agree with you. Nonetheless, this is obviously a true “bad apple” agency, and the more of these that are shut down and punished, the better.

Leave a Reply