On Monday a federal judge in Pennsylvania ruled that, as a matter of law, the language in a letter sent to a consumer that discussed 1099(c) tax consequences would be considered a “false representation or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect a debt” by the least sophisticated debtor.” The case is Balon v. Enhance Recovery Company, Inc. (Case No. 3-16-cv-0410, U.S.D.C. Middle District of Pennsylvania).
Read the Whole Story »