A Kaulkin Ginsberg Publication
CRS
11/22/2009

As President Stands to Grant More Powers, Fed Faces Numerous Attacks

June 17, 2009
 

The Federal Reserve is expected to get a major boost in powers soon from the President. But the expansion of powers is coming at a time when the Fed is under heavy attack on a variety of fronts.

Digg!
What's this?

The Obama administration is expected Wednesday to unveil a proposal granting greater powers to the Federal Reserve, just as lawmakers are calling into question some of the Fed’s actions surrounding the current financial crisis.

A bill currently before the U.S. House of Representatives which would open up the Federal Reserve to Congressional audits has 232 co-sponsors as well as some bipartisan support. The bill, H.R. 1207, is sponsored by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas)

The legislation would give the Government Accountability Office (GAO) authority to examine the Fed’s books and report to Congress on the financial performance of the institution. Because the bill is now officially co-sponsored by a majority of the House, it will be debated on the Floor, per parliamentary procedural rules, though no date for such action is immediately known.

“The tremendous grass-roots and bipartisan support in Congress for H.R. 1207 is an indicator of how mainstream America is fed up with Fed secrecy,” Paul said in a media advisory. “I look forward to this issue receiving greater public exposure.”

“Detractors have argued that the Fed must remain immune from the political process, and that more Congressional oversight would distort their very important decisions,” Paul recently wrote in an editorial. “On the contrary, the Federal Reserve is already heavily entrenched in the political process, as the Fed chairman is a political appointee. High-level officials routinely make the rounds between positions at the Fed, member banks, Treasury and back again, taking care of friends and each other along the way.”

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), along with Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.), also announced recently that the House Financial Services Committee will subpoena the Federal Reserve to ascertain the details of the Fed’s agreements with Bank of America in that institution’s acquisition of Merrill Lynch.

Bank of America Corp. Chief Executive Kenneth Lewis told lawmakers last week that government officials at the Fed pressed him to buy Merrill Lynch & Co. even after he became aware of major losses at the investment bank.

Kucinich last week also provided some symbolism to Paul’s H.R. 1207 when he became the 218th co-sponsor, moving the bill to a mandatory debate with a majority of the House’s 435 members signed on. Kucinich is generally thought to be one of the more liberal members of Congress, Paul one of its more conservative members.

“There are a number of interesting things going on,” said Dan North, chief economist at Euler Hermes ACI, a trade credit insurance firm. “There’s an attack on Fed independence following the crisis. It’s always the same classic reaction: something’s gone wrong, then they want some oversight. They’re asking for more transparency for the Federal Reserve at the same time that the Administration is looking for wider powers.”

When so many people have been hurt financially, legislators want to look for a scapegoat, and right now it’s the Fed, North noted. “They want to do something to fix [the economic situation]. Attacking the Federal Reserve makes a lot of people happy. It makes constituents happy.”

Paul’s measure is unnecessary, North added, because the details of the Fed’s actions are already more transparent than ever.

“It’s important to have an independent central bank so they can direct monetary policy rather than have politicians twist their arm one way or another,” North said. “This never would have come up if the Fed’s balance sheet hadn’t expanded by four or five times.”

 

 

 

Get Hired - jobsInsideARM.comHiring? Post a job - jobsInsideARM.com

Comments

Comment from Anonymous on June 17, 2009 at 11:25AM EST

Go Ron Paul!!!

The banks should not have taken OUR money...

Comment from Ray Perkins on June 17, 2009 at 3:18PM EST

Paul's measure is very necessary. For the details of the Fed's actions are not readily transparent. There are far more competent economists who would disagree than agree with North.

Comment from logicprobe on June 17, 2009 at 1:04AM EST

Fed apologists like North conflate transparency with political pressure. Opening the books to the GAO is not the same thing as politicians dictating the Fed's actions. Shouldn't we the people have the same level of visibility into the Federal Reserve as we have into any company traded on the NY Stock Exchange?

Comment from MG on June 18, 2009 at 2:17PM EST

Abolish Federal Reserve

Comment from FED UP ! on June 21, 2009 at 1:01AM EST

Would you trust your finances to the FED as middleman ?

Care to Comment?

(Please read our comments policy first.)

From:
Show my identity with comment

Leave this field empty
Interested in more stories like this?
Tell us what topics you're interested in and we'll keep you posted. Enter your email address below.
URS
Interior Concepts
Autoscribe
B-Line
  • DAKCS
  • Interior Concepts
  • URS
  • LoneStar
  • Interactive Data

Log In

Already registered? Log in here.





Forgot your password?

Register for FREE with insideARM

Create an account with insideARM and get access to our FREE newsletters and industry reports.








 

Check all | Uncheck all

Daily news and analysis
* Recommended *
Credit cards
Healthcare
Government/Municipal
Student loans
Mortgage
Auto finance
Collection agency operations
Collection technology
Debt purchasing
Recovery management
Hiring/Staffing
Job opportunities
Leave this field empty
 

You are already registered!

The email address you've entered is already in our database, meaning you've previously registered on insideARM.com.

All you have to do is log in using the form on the left.