The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) recently proposed stricter guidelines on telephone communications that would set debt collection efforts back decades, according to people familiar with the proposal.
Most in the industry agree that the communication habits of young adults have made it harder for account receivable management professionals to correctly identify and contact Generation Y consumers (“American Debtor Pool Undergoing Massive Demographic Shift,” Jan. 28). Debt collectors would like nothing more than to be allowed to freely use new communications platforms -- such as cell phones, text messages and social networks -- to contact the younger demographic.
But a recent proposal from the FCC removes a longstanding exemption for the ARM industry for certain rules governing the use of communication technology.
Last month, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking to amend the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). The FCC said it wants current TCPA rules to conform to the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) recently amended Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR).
The new TSR, which became effective in October 2008, bars the use of prerecorded telemarketing calls without a consumer’s written consent, and it requires prerecorded calls to include future opt-out options.
Adam Peterman, ACA International's government affairs director, said creditors and debt collection agencies currently are exempt from the FTC’s Telemarketing Sales Rule. But he said if the FCC’s proposed rule under the TCPA is enacted as currently proposed, the industry will suffer.
"If it goes through it would have a very negative impact on our industry," Peterman said, adding that the FCC's proposed change to the rule implementing the TCPA does not exempt creditors and collection agencies.
The FCC has yet to publish the proposed amendments to the rule in the Federal Register requesting public comment. But Peterman expects it will be published soon. He said ACA is prepared to respond.
Among other things, ACA wants to make sure that the FCC amendment to TCPA rule doesn't prohibit calls to wireless numbers and land lines in some cases, and that new regulation doesn't lead to an increase in consumer lawsuits against collection agencies.
“The rule is unclear enough right now that companies are getting sued. We need some clear guidance that relieves us of the ligation problem," he said.
Jerry Greenblatt, president of El Cajon, Calif.-based collection agency Inland Capital Services, told insideARM that his firm tries to avoid calling cell phones so consumers won’t incur a charge and the firm doesn’t violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). But their contact information files are beginning to include more cell numbers.
“Most people are converting to cell phones and there will be fewer land lines in the future,” Greenblatt said, and speculated that 60 percent to 70 percent of the communication by young people is done though text messaging. “The industry needs to address it and be proactive on the issue. I don’t want to see legislation requiring us to go out and skip trace every number we have to verify if it is a land line or cell phones before we call it. That would make it impossible to collect.”
“When we talk to our consumers we ask for the best number to reach them as part of our information update procedures,” Greenblatt said. But he worries that their efforts may not be enough to protect his firm if the consumer moves to a different time zone, making contact-time violations under the FDCPA more likely.
“I would like to have it addressed before the industry faces multiple lawsuits on the issue,” he noted.
Peterman said ACA knows that the industry wants more clarification on the use of modern-day mediums to contact debtors. However, now is not the time to proactively seek changes to laws governing the industry, he said.
"We recognize that the FDCPA is woefully obsolete and needs modernization reforms. On the other hand, there are some pretty punitive changes that consumer groups have on their agenda and with the political climate being so turbulent right now, we are best served to sit prone, ready to respond, at least through the election cycle," Peterman said.
However, Peterman said ACA has learned that Congress may seek changes to the FDCPA. He said ACA will be prepared to respond with its proposal for changes to FDCPA.
“We are waiting for Congress to take it up on its own accord, and we will respond in kind,” he said.
Editor's Note: insideARM and ACA International will be hosting a free Webinar on the legislative and regulatory environment in the ARM industry at EXPO 3.0, February 16, 2010. To learn more about the event and to register, please visit http://www.insidearm.com/expo/.
(Please read our comments policy first.)
Already registered? Log in here.
The email address you've entered is already in our database, meaning you've previously registered on insideARM.com.
All you have to do is log in using the form on the left.
Comments
Comment from rfink13 on February 4, 2010 at 12:16PM EST
The bottom line is: if the debtor pays for the call (cell phone, text messages charges, etc.) then informed consent should be required.
If all else fails there's always snail mail.
Comment from Anonymous on February 4, 2010 at 12:27PM EST
Fantastic. Looks like consumers may have more reasons to sue collection agencies to avoid paying their bills.
Comment from Whoopie on February 4, 2010 at 12:45PM EST
I cant wait to tell a debtor that he/she got sued in order to protect their rights.
Comment from Whoopie on February 4, 2010 at 12:53PM EST
The best thing we can do is sue as many debtors as possible. When the consumer groups complain, advise them that they are limiting our options and this is the best way to assure that no technical violations occur.
Comment from sd1950 on February 4, 2010 at 1:28PM EST
We got into this mess by putting liberals in office. Remember than in November of this year and get involved in campaigns candidates that have common sense. We have no one to blame for this mess but ourselves for sitting on the side lines
Comment from Patrick Lunsford on February 4, 2010 at 2:28PM EST
@ sd1950
It should be noted that the FTC telemarketing rules that the FCC is trying to mirror came out in 2008. Also, this is government agency-level stuff, meaning career federal workers are making the calls, not elected officials.
Comment from Anonymous on February 5, 2010 at 10:54AM EST
The amendments referenced in the above article, regarding the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule, did not become effective until Sept. 1, 2009.
Comment from Patrick Lunsford on February 5, 2010 at 11:23AM EST
@ Anonymous on February 5, 2010 at 10:54AM
Of course, but the rules were enacted and dated August 2008 (rules rarely become effective immediately upon enactment).
The point of my clarification wasn't to argue technical semantics of Democrats vs. Republicans. I'm merely pointing out that focusing on one party in elections doesn't do a whole lot of good for this industry. Have Republicans traditionally been better for the ARM industry? Absolutely. But I think we can all agree that placating collectors is not high on any party's agenda.
Instead, the industry has been focused on the Federal agencies that actually govern the industry. The ACA, DBA, NARCA and others have done a good job of concentrating on the decision makers in specific agencies.
Comment from Anonymous on April 15, 2010 at 5:42PM EST
That's assuming of course they are paying their cell bill! It may be a moot point sooner than later.