A Kaulkin Media Publication
EPP
January 7, 2009

Wells Fargo to Acquire Wachovia Instead of Citigroup, But…

October 3, 2008
 

Wachovia and Wells Fargo announced Friday that had agreed to merge in a $15.1 billion deal. But Citigroup, who had a deal with Wachovia backed by the FDIC, is crying foul.

Digg!
What's this?

Early Friday, the deal between Citigroup, Wachovia Corporation and the FDIC apparently failed, allowing California-based Wells Fargo to enter into an agreement buy the bank. But Citigroup late Friday morning threatened legal action over the deal.

Wells Fargo will acquire Wachovia, its businesses and obligations, including preferred equity, indebtedness and banking deposits. Wachovia shareholders will receive 0.1991 shares of Wells Fargo common stock, valued at $7 per Wachovia common share, which prices the entire transaction at $15.1 billion.

PSC Info Group

The premium solution that encompasses all services for your same day printing and mailing needs.

Call 866.693.7660 or click here for more info…

Unlike in the Citigroup deal ("Citigroup to Buy Wachovia Banking Operations: FDIC," Sept. 29), Wells Fargo will not be entering into the agreement with aid from the FDIC.

The merger would make the new Wells Fargo-Wachovia one of the largest depository institutions in the United States, with a combined $787 billion in deposits and 10,700 branches in 39 states.

According to an analyst, risks are involved, even though the merger seems to meld perfectly together. Dimitri Michaud, Consumer Finance Analyst with Kaulkin Ginsberg, said, “One big hassle that Wells Fargo is going to have to deal with is Golden West Mortgage Company. They are going to see a problem with Golden West’s assets, but for the mid and long term this is a huge benefit for Wells Fargo.”

Michaud also noted that the previous agreement between Wachovia, Citigroup and the FDIC would have benefited Citigroup, because it would have allowed them to add to Wachovia’s extensive branch network.

Citigroup said late Friday morning that it would fight the merger between Wachovia and Wells Fargo. Citi said that it had exclusive rights under its agreement with Wachovia and claimed that Wachovia was not permitted to talk to anyone else. Citigroup also revealed that it had been supplying liquidity support to Wachovia this week under its agreement.

Citigroup said that it was totally blindsided by the Wells Fargo news and pointed to the fact that it placed a full-page ad touting its deal with Wachovia in newspapers across the country on Friday, including USA Today.

Comments

Comment from Anonymous on October 3, 2008 at 1:10PM EST

Boo-hoo. Wells Fargo is a much better and more well run bank. Sure there will be some pain in this for them but in the end, if they run it like they have traditionally, they will make this deal work for them and do well by their shareholders. Citigroup has other problems that it should focus on, like salvaging its reputation.

Care to Comment?

(Please read our comments policy first.)

From:
Show my identity with comment

Leave this field empty
Interested in more stories like this?
Tell us what topics you're interested in and we'll keep you posted. Enter your email address below.
FurstPerson
Columbia Ultimate
DACKS
eBureau
  • Acxiom
  • eBureau
  • Interactive Data
  • TransUnion
  • Sentinel