A Kaulkin Ginsberg Publication
Interrior Concepts
03/21/2010

Second Half of TARP Funds to Carry More Strings

January 15, 2009
 

The Senate is expected to vote today on the second half of the $700 billion TARP financial rescue plan. But this time, officials will keep a closer eye on the money.

Digg!
What's this?
Despite some of the current questioning on Capitol Hill and in the media, Congress will likely soon approve the second half of the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds, according to experts who have been following the developments. The Senate is expected to vote Thursday on whether to approve the release of the funds.

There has been a lot of consternation about lack of transparency and the actual use of the first tranche of the money, $350 billion approved last fall. A handful of financial institutions used some of the funds to repurchase their own stock, to purchase other “healthy” institutions -- a relative term in today’s financial industry -- or for a host of other unintended uses. In the meantime, many still paid lucrative executive compensation while also maintaining some or all of their dividends.

So the second half of the funds are expected to come with a lot of strings attached. In a letter to Congress earlier this week, Larry Summers, President-elect Barack Obama’s chief economic adviser, wrote: “[President-elect Obama] shares the frustration of the American people that we have seen too little effect from this rescue plan on jobs, incomes and the ability of responsible homeowners to stay in their homes. [He] believes there has been too little transparency and accountability; too much upside for financial institutions and executives who acted irresponsibly without providing enough help for small business owners, families who are struggling to keep their jobs and make ends meet and innocent homeowners.”

Legislators, notably Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), head of the House Financial Services Committee, have also asked for more accountability for the funds. But despite the posturing in Congress, the funds are likely to be approved, according to Scott Sinder, a partner and chair of the government relations and public policy practice for Steptoe & Johnson, Washington, D.C.

“There’s a perception that the money is being abused,” Sinder said. “There’s an honest dispute, the money has yet to be used as intended: to bring relief to [distressed] homeowners.”

Though Frank and several others are asking for more accountability, the concerns are not all that different from those posed by Summers, Sinder says. So he expects either the House or the Senate (only one is needed) to approve the release of the second half of the TARP funds to the Treasury, which will disperse it. How exactly it will be dispersed and what additional strings will be attached is unknown.

Once funds start being dispersed, it should help free up some of the logjam in the credit markets, according to Dan North, chief economist at Euler Hermes ACI, a trade credit insurance firm.

When the credit markets start loosening up, the market for asset-backed securities is likely to come back, which will further ease tight credit markets, said North.

North expects to see an upturn in the economy in the second half of the year due to improving credit markets and improving confidence in the government and its actions.

“A lot of what we’ve been through is a crisis of confidence,” North said, adding that new faces in the administration will help boost consumer confidence.

Get Hired - jobsInsideARM.comHiring? Post a job - jobsInsideARM.com

Comments

Comment from Brad Dey on January 15, 2009 at 1:13PM EST

Nice article, Phil. Yep, i think people are definitely concerned that nothing appears to have changed from this first go-round (Citibank still bleeding badly, after getting $45 billion of that money).

As you pointed out, the lack of governance made no sense (who is to say that CapOne didn't use their $ to buy ChevyChaseBank, for example).

Comment from P. Lucas on January 15, 2009 at 1:24PM EST

Agreed, there has not been much oversight in how banks are using the funds, especially when it comes to buying and shoring up their own stocks. I keep hearing how Citi and BofA bank preferred classes are now considered a good buy thanks to the TARP funds. Good for investors, but not so good for the business owners and consumers that need the credit markets to loosen up.

Once the credit markets do loosen, I hope the banks exercise more discipline in lending and packaging their debt backed securities. Their lack of oversight is what led to the meltdown in the first place.

I don’t feel too confident banks will use the money in the right way or exercise the proper risk management discipline. They begged Congress for a handout, got a windfall and are living fat dumb and happy with no accountability.

Comment from R. Mango on January 15, 2009 at 1:46PM EST

Oversight and compliance with consequences are needed. It is unconscionable that bonuses and incentive compensation would be paid when the firm suffered a loss. There was a time when the bonus had to be earned, and even if earned, there was no payout if the firm showed a loss. The government is used to a 'grant' mentality rather than a loan or equity mentality, the latter requiring compliance, reporting, and possibly acceleration if the conditions are not met.

Comment from future realist on January 15, 2009 at 2:39PM EST

writing language and getting both congress and the banks to agree is beyond the skill their skill sets.ying & yang rules involve lawyers & lacks expediency.congress dosn't have a clue & the banks will dance on our graves before they agree to oversight. the c of c sees the banks as their partner not subordinate.

Comment from Robert on January 15, 2009 at 3:19PM EST

What is the rush for the Senate to approve the release of the 350 billion dollars before President Obama takes office in just 5 days? Or maybe the that is exactly what the rush is all about. Get that money dispersed to the fat cats before it is too late!

Comment from WalkingBear on January 15, 2009 at 3:55PM EST

It's not just bankers and guys on wall street, but you and me and the guy across the street who have traded the gift of life for a big house and material things we really don't need and often can't afford. Greed, a selfish and excessive desire for more than is needed or deserved, especially of money,is at the root of the world economic problems. 350B here 750B there, what is needed is people making smaller footprints on Mother Earth...smaller houses and bigger lives. Mitakuye Oyasin,(we are all related) WalkingBear

Comment from Anonymous on January 19, 2009 at 3:54PM EST

WHAT A CONCEPT!!!!!!!!!!!!

Care to Comment?

(Please read our comments policy first.)

From:
Show my identity with comment

Leave this field empty
Interested in more stories like this?
Tell us what topics you're interested in and we'll keep you posted. Enter your email address below.
CRS
Lariat
Global-Latitude
Global Connect
  • DCM Services
  • Columbia Ultimate
  • Tracers
  • DAKCS
  • Interactive Data

Log In

Already registered? Log in here.





Forgot your password?

Register for FREE with insideARM

Create an account with insideARM and get access to our FREE newsletters and industry reports.










 

Check all | Uncheck all

Daily news and analysis
* Recommended *
Credit cards
Healthcare
Government/Municipal
Student loans
Mortgage
Auto finance
Collection agency operations
Collection technology
Debt purchasing
Recovery management
Hiring/Staffing
Job opportunities
Leave this field empty
 

You are already registered!

The email address you've entered is already in our database, meaning you've previously registered on insideARM.com.

All you have to do is log in using the form on the left.