A Kaulkin Ginsberg Publication
CRS
11/23/2009

Former Portfolio Recovery VP Alleges Racial Discrimination in Lawsuit

January 13, 2009
 

A former Vice President at the debt purchaser says that he was paid less than white workers and fired when he questioned the practice.

Digg!
What's this?
A former executive of Portfolio Recovery Associates has sued the firm for racial discrimination, claiming that the debt buyer underpaid him because he is black and then fired him when he complained.

In the lawsuit filed in the United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia, former PRA vice president Mark Johnson alleged that he received “far less” compensation than other PRA executives with similar responsibilities who are white.

Johnson, who was an assistant vice president at the firm beginning in 2003 and subsequently promoted to vice president, received just under $275,000 in compensation in 2006, while another vice president with similar responsibilities received more than $900,000, according to the complaint, which added that Johnson helped bring “several million dollars” to the firm.

Johnson is seeking up to $4 million in damages.

According to the suit, Johnson was fired in April 2008, after Portfolio Recovery officials accused him of violating a "confidentiality agreement" by disclosing information to an attorney. Johnson contends the disclosure didn’t violate the agreement and the firing was due to questions about the pay discrepancy.

The suit is based on Section 1981 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Similar claims already are available under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, but that statute imposes significant limits on damages and requires plaintiffs to submit their claims for review by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) before they may file suit, said Johnson's attorney, Lisa Bertini, a partner with Bertini O'Donnell & Hammer PC in Norfolk, Va.

Johnson was one of only two African Americans out of more than 30 executives at the firm, Bertini added.

PRA’s law firm did not return phone calls. PRA has filed two separate motions to dismiss the suit, according to Bertini.



Get Hired - jobsInsideARM.comHiring? Post a job - jobsInsideARM.com

Comments

Comment from Anonymous on January 13, 2009 at 7:22PM EST

The board should be questioned for paying any of their VP's at that rate. Are they out of their minds?

Comment from Anonymous on January 14, 2009 at 10:40AM EST

If the variance between the two pay scales is accurate and if the responsibilities are even closely alike, then PRA is wrong. In addition to the law suit for discrimination they should be sued for "Unfair Enrichment".

Care to Comment?

(Please read our comments policy first.)

From:
Show my identity with comment

Leave this field empty
Interested in more stories like this?
Tell us what topics you're interested in and we'll keep you posted. Enter your email address below.
Lariat
Global Connect
Autoscribe
West Asset Management
  • DAKCS
  • West Asset Management
  • URS
  • LoneStar
  • Interactive Data

Log In

Already registered? Log in here.





Forgot your password?

Register for FREE with insideARM

Create an account with insideARM and get access to our FREE newsletters and industry reports.








 

Check all | Uncheck all

Daily news and analysis
* Recommended *
Credit cards
Healthcare
Government/Municipal
Student loans
Mortgage
Auto finance
Collection agency operations
Collection technology
Debt purchasing
Recovery management
Hiring/Staffing
Job opportunities
Leave this field empty
 

You are already registered!

The email address you've entered is already in our database, meaning you've previously registered on insideARM.com.

All you have to do is log in using the form on the left.