A Kaulkin Ginsberg Publication
CRS
11/22/2009

Debate Begins on Government’s $700 billion Bank Bailout

September 22, 2008
 

Over the weekend, details emerged on the bailout plan for financial institutions, including the $700 billion price tag. Now debate begins in earnest as lawmakers, bank executives and investors examine the plan further.

Digg!
What's this?

Congress debated today over the Bush Administration’s proposed $700 billion financial rescue package designed to shore up the mortgage market and financial services companies.

In a related development, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs announced they would be converting from investment banks – the model they’ve operated under for the last 20 years – to more conventional bank holding companies. The moves by Morgan and Goldman were made in the wake of the failures of Bear Sterns and Lehman Brothers and the near failure of AIG as well as the merger of Merrill Lynch and Bank of America.

CallThru IP Telephony System

Debtmaster Collection Software strong

Combining the best features of Voice Broadcasting, Power Dialing, Call Recording, and more...

Comtronic Systems...

The Bush Administration pushed for quick approval of the financial rescue package. “Failure to act would have broad consequences far beyond Wall Street,” President Bush said in a prepared statement. “It would threaten small business owners and homeowners on Main Street.”

But Democrats were pushing for more protections for homeowners and taxpayers.

“The Administration's $700 billion proposal does not include the necessary safeguards.  Democrats believe a responsible solution should include independent oversight, protections for homeowners and constraints on excessive executive compensation,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a prepared statement. “We will not simply hand over a $700 billion blank check to Wall Street and hope for a better outcome.  Democrats will act responsibly to insulate Main Street from Wall Street.”

Pelosi added: "As we proceed to deal with this crisis, this is clear recognition that the party is over for the Bush Administration's anything goes, failed economic policies that have damaged our economy, undermined the middle class and further pointed out the need for a new direction."

Among the highlights of the proposed legislation:

  • The Administration would work with Congress to pass legislation approving the Federal government's purchase of difficult–to-sell assets, such as troubled mortgages, from banks and other financial institutions.
  • Money market funds could opt in and pay a fee to participate in an insurance fund that would compensate investors in the unlikely event that a money market fund must liquidate.
  • The Federal Reserve would also taking steps to provide additional liquidity to money market mutual funds.
As details emerged on the plan, Wall Street took a hard look at the consequences. Many investors were skeptical, sending the stock market lower by more than 200 points in early trading Monday after last week's roller coaster ride on the exchange.

Get Hired - jobsInsideARM.comHiring? Post a job - jobsInsideARM.com

Comments

Comment from Anonymous on September 23, 2008 at 12:57PM EST

The Administration's $700 billion proposal does not include the necessary safeguards. Democrats believe a responsible solution should include independent oversight, protections for homeowners and constraints on excessive executive compensation,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said in a prepared statement. “We will not simply hand over a $700 billion blank check to Wall Street and hope for a better outcome. Democrats will act responsibly to insulate Main Street from Wall Street.”

As a Collector, I agree 100% with Democrats statement above the Bush administration mess it up big time with de-regulation and should not be trusted with blank check plus the executives should not receive compensation from bail out from the tax payers. Personally, I would not do the $700 Billion bail out strapping our kids and grandkids with this massive debt bailout. Plus why would you let the same people who messed it up fix it or benefit from it? Plus why are the discussions not open to the people who have to pay for it? Isn't this country a Democercy any more? Yes I am former replublician who just flip democrat that is so mad I can't stand anyone in Washinton from both parties at this time and would not vote for anyone who would vote on these crap. Where the weapons of mass distruction Iraq? This question hasn't been answer yet now they want us to believe then on $700 billion to bail out millionaires? Trust them no way. Sorry you ask?

Comment from BK on October 1, 2008 at 4:39PM EST

HOW MUCH CENTS PER DOLLAR OF TRUBBLED ASSETS treasury secretary WILL PAY?

Care to Comment?

(Please read our comments policy first.)

From:
Show my identity with comment

Leave this field empty
Interested in more stories like this?
Tell us what topics you're interested in and we'll keep you posted. Enter your email address below.
EPP
Interior Concepts
Autoscribe
B-Line
  • DAKCS
  • Interior Concepts
  • URS
  • LoneStar
  • Interactive Data

Log In

Already registered? Log in here.





Forgot your password?

Register for FREE with insideARM

Create an account with insideARM and get access to our FREE newsletters and industry reports.








 

Check all | Uncheck all

Daily news and analysis
* Recommended *
Credit cards
Healthcare
Government/Municipal
Student loans
Mortgage
Auto finance
Collection agency operations
Collection technology
Debt purchasing
Recovery management
Hiring/Staffing
Job opportunities
Leave this field empty
 

You are already registered!

The email address you've entered is already in our database, meaning you've previously registered on insideARM.com.

All you have to do is log in using the form on the left.