A Kaulkin Ginsberg Publication
Interrior Concepts
11/22/2009

A Trying Time for Debt Buyers, But Opportunity Exists

February 9, 2009
 

The narrative for debt buyers has been set for months now: lower prices for portfolios, but much lower liquidation rates. But there is opportunity for the well-capitalized as higher quality portfolios come into the value range.

Digg!
What's this?

The debt purchasing market is receiving a harsh blow from the recession. On a recent Kaulkin Ginsberg conference call, The State of the Industry: Trends from 2008 and Predictions for 2009, experts noted a number of trends in debt purchasing.

The dreary consumer economic environment has significantly slowed collection rates, causing downward pressure on portfolio prices. At the same time, the ongoing credit crunch has eaten into some buyers’ access to funds to complete purchases, putting even more pressure on debt prices.

While most debt buyers still have to contend with lower collection rates on portfolios that were bought when prices were soaring, the low cost purchasing environment is creating opportunities for those with access to capital.

Debt buyers are now looking at higher quality debt portfolios.

In one example, Encore Capital Group’s (Nasdaq: ECPG) purchase prices for debt portfolios rose in the third quarter of 2008 to $66.1 million from $52.5 million in Q2 2008 because of the cost of higher quality portfolios.

But banks and issuers are fighting the trend of lower prices on their best bad accounts. Many have turned to collection agencies to help out.

“Collection agency outsourcing in the bank card/credit card sector is the focus of credit card issuers in the marketplace today as a result of challenges in achieving what they consider to be appropriate debt portfolio pricing in the marketplace,” said Mark Russell, director at Kaulkin Ginsberg.

Some credit issuers think that the current tax return season is going to come with more debtors paying their debts. But Russell thinks the season is not going to make much of a difference because debtors have more to worry about than paying off old credit cards.

“Consumers, when they get their tax returns, are not going to be willing to use as much of it to pay down debt. They’re going to be concerned about what the future holds for themselves, not as debtors but as employees,” he said.

This will force credit issuers to sell their portfolios next quarter, which could possibly end the portfolio price standoff between credit issuers and debt buyers.

Kaulkin Associate Michael Lamm explained that the debt buying market has hit a wall, with large accumulations of less collectable debt portfolios. The backlog, and the pricing battle between banks and buyers, has greatly reduced demand for portfolio purchasing.

A glance at the SEC filings of some of the publicly traded debt buyers seems to support this notion.

Portfolio Recovery Associates (Nasdaq: PRAA) bought debt portfolios with a face value of $857.2 million through the third quarter of 2008. In 2007, PRA purchased portfolios aggregate face value of $2.61 billion. Similarly, Asset Acceptance Capital Corp. (Nasdaq: AACC) had purchased $500 million less in face value portfolios through the end of the third quarter of last year, when compared to the same period in 2007.


Editor's Note: Kaulkin Ginsberg, a strategic consultant to the ARM industry, is the parent company of insideARM.com.

Get Hired - jobsInsideARM.comHiring? Post a job - jobsInsideARM.com

Comments

Comment from john pratt on February 9, 2009 at 9:29PM EST

This is a great article with a lot of information. One interesting note is that PRAA and AACC bought more debt in 2007 when prices were higher and less in 2008 when prices were lower. This seems a little backward.

I do not agree that issuers will have to sell. I think the portfolios will change due to strategies they employ. When they do sell at a lower price the overall portfolio will have different measurements than in the past.

Maybe due to the government bailouts it will be better for issuers to have a ton of charge-offs.

In the past the issuers did not sell and got by. There are a lot of factors that can influence what happens over the next six months.

Comment from edj@ejohnsoninc.com on February 11, 2009 at 2:59PM EST

There is a great deal of money still available on these asset purchases, this is being missed by these purchasers

Comment from Iain on February 13, 2009 at 2:39AM EST

I fail to understand quite how EDJ would consider distressed debt portfolios to be "assets". Let's face it; many of those debts will become completely uncollectable if the debtor has no means to repay the debt, and no assets either. Put quite simply, if I lost my job, my lowest priority would be ensuring the bottom feeders of the industry saw a single penny. I'm quite certain this reflects the thoughts of the majority.

Care to Comment?

(Please read our comments policy first.)

From:
Show my identity with comment

Leave this field empty
Interested in more stories like this?
Tell us what topics you're interested in and we'll keep you posted. Enter your email address below.
CR Software
Global Connect
Comtronic Systems
Interior Concepts
  • DAKCS
  • Interior Concepts
  • URS
  • LoneStar
  • Interactive Data

Log In

Already registered? Log in here.





Forgot your password?

Register for FREE with insideARM

Create an account with insideARM and get access to our FREE newsletters and industry reports.








 

Check all | Uncheck all

Daily news and analysis
* Recommended *
Credit cards
Healthcare
Government/Municipal
Student loans
Mortgage
Auto finance
Collection agency operations
Collection technology
Debt purchasing
Recovery management
Hiring/Staffing
Job opportunities
Leave this field empty
 

You are already registered!

The email address you've entered is already in our database, meaning you've previously registered on insideARM.com.

All you have to do is log in using the form on the left.