Fake Courtroom Debt Collector Wins Right to Fight $1.2 million Fine

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

A judge in Pennsylvania denied the state attorney general’s motion to enter a default judgment against a man accused of using a fake courtroom to coerce debtors into paying off their accounts. The latest move in the long-running case saw the AG ask for $1.2 million in penalties and fines.

The judge earlier this week denied a default judgment against Anthony Covatto, a senior executive of now-defunct debt collection agency Unicredit, based in Erie, Pa. Covatto is the half-brother of Michael Covatto, the owner of Unicredit and the man authorities say was the chief architect of a scheme that saw consumers lured to a fake courtroom under the pretense they were sitting before a real judge.

The practice was halted two years ago under intense media scrutiny. Since then, state prosecutors have been trying to get punitive measures levied against the company and its principles. In July, a judge permanently barred Covatto from the debt collection industry.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Linda Kelly wants the Covattos to pay $1.2 million in restitution and sought to use a previous default against Michael Covatto to force a judgment against Anthony. But the judge ruled that Anthony has a right to fight the proposed restitution in court.

The AG’s office said that the total restitution would include about $875,000 in fines related to Unicredit’s collection practices with the rest going to pay for investigative costs and legal fees accrued by the state’s prosecutors.

State officials noted that it was important that they go after both Covattos because Michael had declared bankruptcy shortly after a default judgment was entered against him.

The case will now proceed and it is not known whether Anthony will defend the charges.

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Posted in Collection Law Firms, Collection Laws and Regulations, Debt Collection, FDCPA, Featured Post .

×
Subscribe to never miss important news and resources from insideARM.com:

Continuing the Discussion

We welcome and encourage readers to comment and engage in substantive exchanges over topics on insideARM.com. Users must always follow our Terms of Use. Also know that your comment will be deleted if you: use profanity, engage in any kind of hate speech, post an incoherent or irrelevant thought, make a point of targeting anyone, or do anything else we find unsavory. Your comment will be posted under your current Display Name, shown below. If you'd like to change your Display Name, you must update it on the My Profile page.

  • avatar todd-bean says:

    “The case will now proceed and it is not known whether Anthony will defend the charges.”

    Oh Anthony please, please, please show up and fight this. I’m dying to hear this defense !!

  • avatar jessie-gomez says:

    It just go to show how stupid consumers are showing up at a fake courtroom. Very good move Michael on filing a BK to protect yourself.

Leave a Reply