CFPB Panel 1: Info Available to Debt Collectors at Time of Assignment, Sale

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Moderator: Thomas Kane, FTC

Panelists:

Manoj Hastak, American University

Loraine Lyons, FMA Alliance

David Pauken, Convoke Systems

Ira Rheingold, National Association of Consumer Advocates

Larry Tewell, Wells Fargo

 

Contigency collectors?

Thomas Kane: What do contingency collectors typically receive?

Loraine Lyons:

  • Depends on the type of debt and the sophistication of the creditor.
  • Name of consumer
  • Address
  • Phone number
  • Very minimal requirements that are going to be contained.
  • In some cases we have access to the creditor’s system for this data.
  • We want to contact the right consumer and collect legitimate debts.
  • There is a constant flow of info between us and the creditors we work with.
  • Will notify creditor client when there’s a request for verification.
  • As a contingency collection agency, we do not own the debt.

Thomas Kane asked Larry Tewell: do you sell and also place?

Larry Tewell:

  • Creditors have four primary options: (1) Work debt internally inside the bank; (2) place with agency; (3) might sell it into debt buying ecosystem; (4) work with attorneys for litigation.
  • The industry in general provides enough info for a consumer to recognize the debt.

Thomas Kane asked Ira Rheingold is the info agencies receive sufficient?

Ira Rheingold:

  • I don’t have actual information about what’s being transferred.
  • Our main concern is the debt buying industry.
  • Original contract needs to be provided, credit history, etc.
  • Information is not provided to consumers.
  • That information, to start with, is very essential.
  • The information gets worse every time you move a step away from the original creditor.

Thomas Kane: What do debt buyers obtain when they buy debt? What information does a debt buyer generally obtain at the time they purchase the debt?

Larry Tewell:

  • Referencing FTC Debt Buying Report: name, account number, social security number, phone number, last known address, date account opened, date account charged off.
  • If we could have uniform national standards, it would go a long way towards allowing this system to function well.

Thomas Kane: Tell us briefly how the debt buying system works. (Who hires, where does the data come from)

Dave Pauken

  • Credit issuer sells to a debt buyer
  • Following sale, they would unload to Convoke all the info Larry mentioned (name, account number, social security number, phone number, last known address, date account opened, date account charged off)
  • Different issuers have different approaches to delivering documents.
  • Some might provide last 6 or 12 months of statements. Others wait for a request.

Thomas Kane: Any sorts of documents that your database could hold that aren’t being asked to h0ld?

Dave Pauken

  • We can capture just about any document necessary.
  • Charge off statement, and last statement that reflects either payment or charge.
  • We can deliver nearly 100% of those in a short period of time.

Thomas Kane: Ira, is that info sufficient?

Ira Rheingold:

  • Is the initial information from the creditor even reliable?
  • Can credit issuers even maintain good information?
  • In terms of info being sold: if this info is so good, why is it being sold so cheaply?
  • If you’re providing valuable info that is useful and reliable, it would be worth a lot more than two or three cents.
  • The information being transferred to the debt buyer is insufficient.

Thomas Kane: You question the data, but for our purposes, what kinds of docs/info should debt buyers get that they’re not getting now at the time of sale?

Ira Rheingold:

  • I don’t know why that info isn’t provided initially. Why wait for the moment of dispute.
  • Many debt buyers have a model of Take Debt and Litigate.
  • A lot of the issues we see today would be mitigated if the info was provided at initial moment.

Thomas Kane: Should everything be provided at time of sale?

Larry Tewell:

  • Basic premise: it’s not a matter of infomration availability. It’s a matter of information variability.
  • Two basic things that we can do as leaders of our industry: (1) create rational standards; (2) see some discipline around test and control.
  • The basic premise of getting it right is a goal we share.

Thomas Kane: What are the benefits to having debt buyers have more info?

Ira Rheingold:

  • It makes the process work.
  • It would cost more money.
  • Make it easier for debt buyers to collect debt.
  • When you provide original notice, you can solve some of the problem about disputes when the data is provided.

Thomas Kane: Any technical solutions?

Ira Rheingold:

  • There’s no reason why tech can’t help.
  • This information should be in a useful and legally reliable form and be able to transfer it.
  • The question has to be, “What is this industry going to look like five years from now?”
  • No willingness from creditors, though, to make that work.

Thomas Kane: Any suggestions about national standards?

Larry Tewell:

  • The industry is very interested in providing consumer info.
  • There can be confusion around original ownership and who is owed the money.

Thomas Kane: Information conveyed to consumers? Validation? 1692-G notice? How can these disclosures be improved?

Minoj Hastak:

  • An area fraught with challenge and frustration.
  • Disclosures must be tested. There’s a reluctance to test disclosures.
  • Many look pretty clear on the face of it.
  • Different audiences are looking for different things from disclosure.
  • Better information will improve consumer choice.
  • Disclosures need to be tested in order to understand their value.

Thomas Kane: What sorts of information are debt collectors currently providing to consumers in validation notices:

Loraine Lyons:

  • Provide information required: name of creditor and amount due.
  • Some industry members have gone beyond that. List original creditor and current creditor.
  • We want consumers to understand why they’re being contacted.
  • We need uniform national standards based on research and best practices.

Thomas Kane: Doesn’t more info make collection easier?

Loraine Lyons:

  • Not necessarily. It didn’t make the debt more collectible or more valuable.
  • We can embrace new tech and interfaces that will improve collection process.
  • We’ll need

Ira Rheingold:

  • Minimal info is being provided — and it’s intentional.
  • No need to provide any more.
  • You can’t ignore the fact that the reason the info is scant is because its best for the current business model of debt buying.
  • As we move to a new system where courts won’t rubber stamp millions of new cases, that data will become necessary.

Thomas Kane: Any useful information that debt collectors can convey to consumers?

Larry Tewell:

  • Be consistent between collection call and letter.
  • We’re all consumers
  • Original creditor name in the proper context.
  • Last payment, last payment date.
  • It’s not that we don’t want to provide the information; there is a risk of providing too much information and overwhelming the consumer.

Thomas Kane: Validation notices?

Minoj Hastak:

  • Dealing with long, complex disclosures.
  • One of the issues with long disclosures is to use it as a vehicle for consumer education.
  • Verbal disclosures are also very challenging.
  • Testing is the only way.

Thomas Kane: Is the info that collection agencies convey to consumers in a validation notice different from the info in the early communications?

Loraine Lyons:

  • Not necessarily. We’re going to state we’re a debt collector, etc.
  • We’re going to say the same thing in a call. We’re going to identify ourselves.

Submitted Questions:

1) Concrete information abotu incremental costs in uploading information?

Dave Pauken:

  • All tech has costs. It’s not free.
  • To provide info, there’s a cost. Issuers incur cost to deliver. Debt buyers incur cost to pull it in.
  • When we think about providing info in a more efficient way, it also has to be cost-effective.
  • We think it can be done at a price that is efficient for all involved.

Larry Tewell:

  • I’m not concerned about the cost. If it adds value, we’ll find a way to do it.
  • When we move data, are we safeguarding the customer’s information?

2) Can you comment further on advantages/disadvantages of using creditor system v. agency’s own?

Loraine Lyons:

  • Varies by sophistication.
  • Benefit to using creditor system if it’s the better system.
  • Does it have more information that is meaningful?
  • If that info can be passed, then we’re in the same position.
  • You have to look at parties involved and type of debt.

3) Do you think consumers would identity debt more readily if a charge-off statement was included?

Ira Rheingold:

  • A breakdown of the cost would be the most useful thing for a consumer to have.
  • The more info you provide that gives context is beneficial.

4) How many unsophisticated consumers can understand validation notice as written in FDCPA?

Minoj Hastak:

  • Not my area of expertise.
  • Almost nothing in a Google search about what validation is.

5) Do contingency or debt buyers get info about disputes?

Dave Pauken:

  • Don’t see a lot of that happening.
  • The customers we’re working with, there’s a high level of interest.
  • Finding a tool for an efficient and effective way.

Ira Rheingold:

  • A consumer may dispute, and may be right, but when it gets sold, the next down the line does the exact same thing.
  • That history has to be part of information that gets included.

Loraine Lyons:

  • My experience is that there’s an exchange of information.
  • The initial agency would submit info to creditor and the dispute is investigated.
  • Disputes are either justified or unjustified.

Final Thoughts

Minoj Hastak

  • Developing good disclosures is a challenging activity
  • Testing is only root at successful disclosure
  • Standardizing disclosures is a good idea, but presents significant challenges.

Loraine Lyons

  • Standardized notice: our industry would welcome model language, uniform to all consumers.
  • That will help improve level of confidnece

David Pauken

  • By and large, there’s interest in improving processes that benefit consumers.
  • They’re doing a good job of trying to understand issuer and collection-side of things.

Ira Rheingold

  • It’s in everybody’s common interest, when debt is sold the information it’s sold with is complete.
  • The only want the system work is if everyone has access to trustworthy information.

Larry Tewell

  • In common interest to do what’s best for customer.
  • We want to provide all info that helps a customer identify debt.
  • Test and control is very important
  • Uniform national statnds relateive to data and media when interjected will benefit all participants — mostly consumer
  • Consumer education
  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Posted in Accounts Receivable Management, Banks and Credit Grantors, CFPB, Charge-off, Collection Technology, Credit Card Receivables, Credit Grantors, Debt Buying, Debt Collection, Debt Recovery, FDCPA .

×
Subscribe to never miss important news and resources from insideARM.com:

Continuing the Discussion

We welcome and encourage readers to comment and engage in substantive exchanges over topics on insideARM.com. Users must always follow our Terms of Use. Also know that your comment will be deleted if you: use profanity, engage in any kind of hate speech, post an incoherent or irrelevant thought, make a point of targeting anyone, or do anything else we find unsavory. Your comment will be posted under your current Display Name, shown below. If you'd like to change your Display Name, you must update it on the My Profile page.

Leave a Reply