State Sues Payday Loan Collection Agency

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel announced Tuesday that he has filed a consumer-protection lawsuit against a Kansas-based debt collection agency that sought to collect on payday loan debts in the state.

The lawsuit, filed in Pulaski County Circuit Court, claims that National Credit Adjusters LLC (NCA) of Hutchinson, Kan., violated the Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act in its attempts to collect on payday and high-interest installment loan debts that are “usurious, unconscionable, and void under Arkansas law.”

McDaniel’s suit alleges that NCA misrepresented to Arkansas consumers that debt originated by payday lenders and high-interest installment lenders are enforceable and collectable when, in fact, they are not, according to Arkansas law.

“We will do our part to protect Arkansas consumers from the illegal actions of the payday lending industry and those entities associated with it,” McDaniel said. “Though we have successfully shut down storefront payday lenders, we will continue to aggressively pursue online lenders who violate Arkansas law or collection agencies like this that attempt to collect on illegal debt.”

McDaniel said that NCA purchases the right to collect on delinquent debt, and in doing so, has purchased a large number of debts from payday loans and high-interest installment loans. These types of loans carry exorbitant interest rates that greatly exceed the amount allowed by Arkansas law.

The lawsuit asks the Court to issue an injunction prohibiting NCA from actions that violate Arkansas law, cancel outstanding usurious loan contracts, and order NCA to return to Arkansas consumers any money collected based on payday or high-interest installment loans.

In addition, McDaniel seeks civil penalties and costs.

The lawsuit mirrors suits many, many other actions filed by state regulators against ARM companies playing in the payday loan space.

Related Content:

 

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Posted in Collection Laws and Regulations, Debt Buying, Debt Collection, Featured Post .

Continuing the Discussion

We welcome and encourage readers to comment and engage in substantive exchanges over topics on insideARM.com. Users must always follow our Terms of Use. Also know that your comment will be deleted if you: use profanity, engage in any kind of hate speech, post an incoherent or irrelevant thought, make a point of targeting anyone, or do anything else we find unsavory. Your comment will be posted under your current Display Name, shown below. If you'd like to change your Display Name, you must update it on the My Profile page.

  • avatar Ryan Watson says:

    It will be interesting to see how this plays out. It’s an out-of-state contract, so AR law shouldn’t apply here.

    FWIW, I hate payday loans, and consider them leeches on the poor and uneducated.

  • avatar Jeffery Hartman says:

    I’ll be watching this case very closely.

  • avatar harrison-gevirtz says:

    this is a BS way for creditors to get out of a debt.

Leave a Reply