California AG Gets $1 million Judgment Against Lender Over Collection Practices

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

California Attorney General Edmund G. “Jerry” Brown, Jr. announced Monday that his office won a judgment against an Anaheim-based small-balance lender that will force the company to stop using “loan shark tactics in collecting debt, including abusive calls at all hours of the day and night and empty threats of law enforcement action.”

Brown’s judgment against CashCall, Inc. also calls for the company to pay $1 million in civil penalties and legal expenses.

The lawsuit alleged that CashCall used misleading advertising in addition to aggressive debt collection tactics that included:

  • Making excessive and verbally abusive telephone calls at all hours of the day and night;
  • Causing borrowers to incur bank fees by repeatedly trying to collect payments despite knowing there were insufficient funds in the borrowers’ accounts; 
  • Threatening to initiate law enforcement and wage garnishment proceedings against borrowers without any basis for doing so; 
  • Improperly discussing private financial information with borrowers’ friends, colleagues and neighbors; 
  • Failing to honor borrowers’ requests to cancel automatic withdrawals from checking accounts; and 
  • Continuing to contact borrowers by phone after receiving requests to only contact them in writing.

Brown also said that CashCall’s advertising consistently misrepresented the effective interest rates on the loans the company provided to consumers.  The AG’s office said that the lender charged what amounted to 139 percent annual interest on its loans, which was not reflected in the advertising. Brown noted that the company used former Diff’rent Strokes star Gary Coleman in its TV advertising campaign.

"CashCall preyed on consumers desperate for cash, charging triple digit interest rates and using loan shark tactics to collect on their debts," Brown said. "This judgment forces CashCall to stop harassing its customers and should serve as a warning to consumers to be wary of fast-money lenders."

Brown said that the court order “puts an end to CashCall’s illegal debt collection practices and stops its misleading advertising.” The settlement also requires CashCall to:

  • Stop making excessive and verbally abusive telephone calls at all hours of the day and night;
  • Pay $1 million in civil penalties and expenses related to the investigation and resolution of this case; 
  • Train its employees within 30 days and not fewer than four times per year thereafter to ensure compliance with the judgment; 
  • Terminate any officer, director or employee who violates the terms of the judgment; 
  • Record all telephone calls made to, or received from, prospective and current borrowers; and 
  • Maintain a detailed log of all consumer complaints.

  • Email
  • Print
  • Printing Articles

    1. Click here to print!
    2. ...or print directly from your browser by choosing File > Print... from the menu or by pressing [Ctrl + P]. Our printer-friendly stylesheet will make sure extraneous website stuff isn't printed.
    3. You're done!

    Close this message.

  • Comments
  • RSS

Posted in Collection Laws and Regulations, Credit Grantors .

Continuing the Discussion

We welcome and encourage readers to comment and engage in substantive exchanges over topics on insideARM.com. Users must always follow our Terms of Use. Also know that your comment will be deleted if you: use profanity, engage in any kind of hate speech, post an incoherent or irrelevant thought, make a point of targeting anyone, or do anything else we find unsavory. Your comment will be posted under your current Display Name, shown below. If you'd like to change your Display Name, you must update it on the My Profile page.

  • avatar Michael Janakes says:

    Gary Coleman was the spokesman? And folks were surprised that the company was rinkie-dink? Hmmm.

  • avatar keith levey says:

    Gee, did they think the Rosenthal Act did not apply to them?

    Interesting about the recording calls order. What if the caller objects? Is there an opt-out?

  • avatar Jim Marshall says:

    Gary Coleman was used in advertising because he took a 10K loan he couldnt pay back to them.

  • avatar Tony Pinto says:

    They should be out of business completely, not fined a measley million dollars.

  • avatar cloud rainmakar says:

    Greetings,

    Re anonymous post 8/25;
    Yes, they did think that the Rosenthal Act did not apply to them, and technically it did’nt, since they were not third party debt collectors.

    They were busted for ” deceptive and unlawful practices “; different laws ) and elements of the offenses ) entirely.

  • avatar ernie hayes says:

    Their customers affected by the deceptive advertisment and herrassment should be awarded a cash settlement.

Leave a Reply