TransUnion (TRU), a leading global risk and information solutions provider to businesses and consumers, announced today the pricing of its initial public offering of 29,545,455 shares of its common stock at $22.50 per share. That share price would put a total value of the company at approximately $4 billion. TRU is most well-known to consumers […]
Among other things, the report indicates that the non-public supervisory actions and self-reported violations at banks and nonbanks during the period in question resulted in $11.6 million in remediation to more than 80,000 consumers.
Yesterday, the CFPB announced an enforcement action against a medical debt collection company for mishandling consumer credit reporting disputes and preventing consumers from exercising important debt collection rights. The company is ordered to provide over $5.4 million in relief to harmed consumers, and pay a $500,000 penalty. At the core is a lack of adequate policies and procedures.
These collectors operate outside the purview of the CFPB and with the full authority of those government agencies. These collectors frequently charge exorbitant fees and often hold the ability to effect wage garnishments, arrest, and even foreclosure against consumers. The consumers most vulnerable economically, are often caught in this cycle compounding the possibility of mistreatment.
Some questions had definite answers from panelists; however, many of the questions highlighted confusion within the laws and regulations themselves. While the FTC requires one thing, the CFPB may require something entirely different — and often contradictory. And because there is little cohesion among state laws, compliance suffers across the board. Still, even recognizing the areas of confusion can help an agency in their compliance plan. Better still, though, would be some kind of definitive answer.
The Primary Group is alleged to have sent consumers multiple text messages, and, in most cases, failing to disclose the company as a debt collector. Per Jessica Rich, Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection: “[Debt collectors] can’t harass or lie to you, whether they send a text, email, or call you.” She also stated that “legitimate debt collectors know the rules.”
According to data provided by WebRecon LLC, FDCPA litigation is trending up in 2015. Litigation was up 10% over last month, and for the first four months of the year, up 12.5% over the same period a year ago.
You should probably stop charging convenience fees. You also probably won’t listen to me, or to your compliance team. But convenience fees are proving to be ironically named, and a sure-fire way to involve your agency in a class action lawsuit — at the least.
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear an important case that will decide whether a plaintiff who cannot show any actual harm from a violation of the FCRA nevertheless has standing to sue for statutory damages in federal court. The consequences of the decision will likely extend significantly beyond FCRA litigation and affect numerous other statutes, including the FDCPA and TCPA .
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Tuesday announced a settlement with a national mortgage servicing company over charges that it engaged in illegal debt collection and loan servicing practices.