On July 14, 2014, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), a Federal regulatory body created by the Dodd Frank Act of 2010 mounted a frontal attack on this bedrock of separation of powers principle by filing suit in the United States District Court against a prominent consumer collection law firm, Frederick J. Hanna and Associates, P.C. of Atlanta Georgia.
Expert Global Solutions (EGS), a global leader in the Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) industry and parent company of ARM giant NCO Group, announced Monday that it has entered into an agreement to sell certain segments of its ARM business to private equity firm Platinum Equity. Financial terms of the pending transaction were not disclosed.
With half of the year already gone and the official start of Q3, now is a great time to review your marketing goals for the year. What did you want to accomplish? Have you started yet?
The CFPB announced Monday it has filed a lawsuit against a debt collection law firm and its three principal partners alleging that the firm was a “lawsuit mill” that churned out debt collection actions and violated the FDCPA en masse. The firm denies the claims and says it will defend the action in court.
The FCC last week threw another clarifying wrinkle in the struggle to understand “express prior consent” to call a cell number for the purpose of debt collection. In an amicus brief, the agency explored some nuance in its 2008 TCPA declaratory ruling while clarifying another ruling from this year.
As we note every year, free participation in the program entitles companies to valuable data on the way they run their businesses. But what, exactly, is available?
Today, another story from ARMing Heroes shines a light yet again on how selfless and giving these heroes truly are.
The full Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals last week struck down rulings from lower courts, a previous three-judge circuit panel, and even a decision it reached itself in 1996 to reinterpret venue provisions of the FDCPA as they relate to townships vs. counties in Indiana.
A U.S. District Judge last week ruled that a debt collection law firm violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by not conducting a “meaningful review” of a collection action filed against a consumer. The judge used reasoning from the landmark case Lesher, decided three years ago.
A federal judge in Maryland this week sided with a collection agency in a TCPA case involving the question of “prior express consent” to call a cell phone number that was provided by the consumer. The decision mirrors another recent case in a trend that shows judges moving away from the controversial Mais decision.